Within UFO Hackers

Why No Screenshot Changes Everything

McKinnon's inability to produce captured files is central to why his most famous UFO claims remain unverified.

On this page

  • The missing image problem
  • Why memory is not proof
  • What stronger evidence would look like
Preview for Why No Screenshot Changes Everything

Introduction

Gary McKinnon’s best-known UFO claims turn on a simple evidential gap: he did not produce the image, spreadsheet, file path, system log, screenshot, or saved copy that would allow anyone else to test what he says he saw. McKinnon has said he briefly viewed a high-resolution NASA image showing a strange craft and found a spreadsheet headed “Non-Terrestrial Officers”, but the public record contains only his account of those moments, not the files themselves. [WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He Found21 Jun 2006 — The search for proof of the existence of UFOs landed Gary McKinnon in a world of troub…

Overview image for No Files That is why the missing screenshot changes the case so much. The documented part of the story is the unauthorised access: US prosecutors alleged that McKinnon accessed and damaged computers belonging to the US Army, Navy, Air Force, Department of Defense, NASA and private businesses. [Department of Justice]justice.govmckinnon IndictDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…According to the indictment, between March of 2001 and March… The UFO part is different. Without captured files, the claim remains a memory of an alleged screen view inside a remote session. It may be sincere, but it is not independently verifiable.

The missing image problem

The most discussed McKinnon claim concerns an image he says he saw after accessing a NASA department connected in his account with Johnson Space Center’s Building 8. In his 2006 Wired interview, McKinnon said he had heard that UFOs were being removed from high-resolution satellite images, then found folders containing “filtered and unfiltered” or “processed and unprocessed” files. He described a slow 56K connection, a remote desktop session reduced to low colour and low resolution, and a brief view of a silvery, cigar-shaped object with geodesic spheres before he was disconnected. [WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…

The crucial detail is that McKinnon himself said he did not obtain the image. He told Wired that because he was using a Java application, the picture did not end up in his temporary internet files and that he could only have captured it with a screenshot before the connection was cut. [WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No… In other words, the most dramatic visual claim in the McKinnon story depends on a file that the public cannot inspect.

That absence matters because an image is not just decoration. A real file could carry dimensions, compression artefacts, metadata, timestamps, naming conventions and surrounding directory context. Even a screenshot would be weaker than the original file, but it could still give investigators something to compare against NASA image archives, remote-desktop behaviour, image-processing workflows, hoaxes, concept art, satellite imagery, or ordinary aerospace material. Without the image, there is no shared object of analysis.

The same problem applies to the “Non-Terrestrial Officers” claim. McKinnon told Wired he accessed Excel spreadsheets, including one with that title, names and ranks, and ship-to-ship transfer information; when asked whether it could have been a military game or hypothetical scenario, he answered that it “could be a game” and that it was hard to know for certain. [WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No… That caveat is important. A saved spreadsheet could be examined for column headings, workbook tabs, author metadata, file location and internal terminology. A remembered phrase cannot.

No Files illustration 1

Why memory is not proof

Memory can be honest and still be insufficient as evidence. McKinnon’s account is not automatically false because he failed to save the material. The problem is narrower and more practical: a memory cannot be independently checked, reproduced, authenticated or compared with alternative explanations.

Digital-evidence standards exist precisely because electronic material is easy to alter, misread, lose or remove from context. NIST describes digital forensics as the retrieval, storage and analysis of electronic data useful in investigations, while its guidance on forensic techniques stresses proper gathering, handling and preservation so that decision-makers can rely on the evidence. [NIST]nist.govdigital evidenceDigital evidence | NISTJune 30, 2016 — Digital forensics is the field of forensic science that is concerned with retrieving, storing…Published: June 30, 2016 The UK’s ACPO digital-evidence principles similarly require an audit trail or record of processes applied to digital evidence, so an independent third party can examine those processes and reach the same result. [npcc.police.uk]npcc.police.ukOpen source on police.uk.

McKinnon’s UFO claims lack that audit trail. There is no publicly available original image. There is no hash value proving a file remained unchanged. There is no documented capture process. There is no preserved directory listing. There is no authenticated spreadsheet. There is no independent examiner who can repeat the route from system to file and confirm what was viewed.

That gap does not erase the legal and historical importance of the hacking case. The US government’s allegations, extradition proceedings and later political controversy are documented in official and parliamentary records. The House of Lords judgment described the US extradition request as alleging that McKinnon gained unauthorised access to 97 US Government computers from London, and the UK Government later summarised the accusation as unauthorised access to government computers concerned with national defence and security. [UK Parliament]publications.parliament.ukmckinn 1mckinn 1 But those records establish the cybercrime allegations, not the truth of the claimed UFO discoveries.

The result is a two-layer story. The intrusion is a matter of legal record and admitted conduct. The UFO material is a claimed observation without the primary evidence needed to test it.

What a screenshot could and could not have done

A screenshot would not have “proved aliens” on its own. Screenshots can be cropped, staged, mislabelled, compressed, edited or stripped of context. A still image of an unusual object could also have ordinary explanations: a classified aircraft, a visual artefact, a calibration target, a model, a rendering, an image-processing mistake, or a file stored in the wrong place.

Even so, a screenshot would have changed the discussion because it would have created a fixed artefact. Instead of asking only whether McKinnon’s memory is credible, researchers could ask more useful questions:

  • Does the image match any known NASA, military, satellite, rendering or concept-art source?
  • Is the user interface consistent with the tools and remote-access method McKinnon described?
  • Does any visible file path, filename, timestamp or folder structure support the claimed location?
  • Do compression patterns or display settings match a remote desktop viewed over a low-bandwidth connection?
  • Could the object be measured against Earth, cloud, shadow or sensor context?

A saved original file would be stronger still. Properly preserved digital files can be examined for metadata, provenance, modification history and consistency with the system where they were allegedly found. NIST’s digital-evidence preservation work treats preservation, source context and integrity as central concerns, not optional extras. [NIST Publications]nvlpubs.nist.govPublications Digital Evidence PreservationPublications Digital Evidence Preservation

This is why the McKinnon case is so often retold but rarely advanced. The story has a vivid image in words, but not an image that can be examined. It has memorable terminology, especially “Non-Terrestrial Officers”, but not the workbook that would show whether the phrase meant extraterrestrial personnel, space-related staff, a simulation category, a joke, an exercise, or something else entirely.

No Files illustration 2

The saved-file issue is bigger than one screenshot

The absence of saved files affects more than the famous NASA image. It limits every major UFO-related claim attached to McKinnon’s name.

First, it prevents corroboration. If an image or spreadsheet had been saved and later seized, logged, described in court filings, leaked, forensically imaged or independently witnessed, the public debate would not have to rely entirely on a single narrator. McKinnon has said in interviews that he saw extraordinary material, but the public evidence available through major reporting does not include an authenticated copy of that material. [WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He Found21 Jun 2006 — The search for proof of the existence of UFOs landed Gary McKinnon in a world of troub…

Second, it prevents interpretation. The phrase “Non-Terrestrial Officers” sounds dramatic because UFO readers naturally hear “not from Earth”. But bureaucratic language is often stranger and duller than it appears. Without the spreadsheet, the phrase could refer to off-planet operations, space command concepts, non-ground-based roles, hypothetical exercises, naval-style “ships”, science-fictional test data, or a training scenario. McKinnon himself acknowledged uncertainty when Wired raised the possibility of a strategy game or hypothetical outline. [WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…

Third, it prevents proportionality. The official case concerned unauthorised access, alleged damage and national-security systems, not a public authentication process for UFO files. The Department of Justice alleged intrusions into 92 computers belonging to US military, defence and NASA entities, plus six private-business computers. [Department of Justice]justice.govmckinnon IndictDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…According to the indictment, between March of 2001 and March… That does not tell readers whether McKinnon saw what he says he saw. It tells them that the legal machinery was focused on computer misuse and damage allegations, not on validating UFO claims.

What stronger evidence would look like

For McKinnon’s UFO claims to move from anecdote to verifiable evidence, the missing material would need to be replaced by something examinable. The strongest evidence would not be a later drawing, a retelling, or a dramatic phrase repeated in UFO media. It would be a preserved digital trail.

A stronger evidence package would include the original image or spreadsheet, a documented acquisition process, timestamps, file paths, hashes, surrounding directory listings, system logs, and an explanation of how the material was obtained without altering it. Digital-forensic guidance places weight on preservation, proper handling and records of what was done to electronic evidence because those steps allow others to test authenticity and integrity. [NIST Publications]nvlpubs.nist.govspecialpublication800 86NIST PublicationsNIST SP 800-86, Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques…by K Kent · Cited by 1010 — The guidelines and procedures sh…

For the NASA image claim, the most useful evidence would be the original unprocessed file and its alleged processed counterpart. That pairing is central because McKinnon’s story is not merely that he saw an unusual object; it is that he found a workflow in which images existed in both unfiltered and filtered forms. Without both files, the alleged “airbrushing” process cannot be tested.

For the spreadsheet claim, the key evidence would be the workbook itself. Its metadata, sheet names, column headings, internal references, author information, storage location and surrounding files would matter as much as the phrase “Non-Terrestrial Officers”. The file might support a remarkable interpretation, but it might also reveal a mundane one. The point is that the file would let the question be investigated rather than endlessly repeated.

No Files illustration 3

The fair conclusion

The fair reading of the McKinnon evidence is neither “therefore aliens” nor “therefore he invented everything”. It is that his most famous UFO claims remain unverified because the primary digital evidence is missing. The legal record supports the reality of a major unauthorised-access case; it does not authenticate the alleged UFO image or spreadsheet. [Department of Justice]justice.govmckinnon IndictDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…According to the indictment, between March of 2001 and March…

That distinction is the reason screenshots and saved files matter. They turn a private moment on a screen into a public object that can be challenged, tested, contextualised and either strengthened or weakened. McKinnon’s story has survived because it is vivid, unusual and tied to real cybercrime proceedings. But the missing screenshot is not a minor footnote. It is the boundary between a claim people can discuss and evidence people can examine.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why No Screenshot Changes Everything. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA

Endnotes

  1. Source: wired.com
    Title: ufo hacker tells what he found
    Link: https://www.wired.com/2006/06/ufo-hacker-tells-what-he-found/
    Source snippet

    WIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He Found21 Jun 2006 — The search for proof of the existence of UFOs landed Gary McKinnon in a world of troub...

  2. Source: justice.gov
    Title: mckinnon Indict
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict.htm
    Source snippet

    Department of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud...According to the [indictment]({{ 'indictment/' | relative_url }}), between March of 2001 and March...

  3. Source: nist.gov
    Title: digital evidence
    Link: https://www.nist.gov/digital-evidence
    Source snippet

    Digital evidence | NISTJune 30, 2016 — Digital forensics is the field of forensic science that is concerned with retrieving, storing...

    Published: June 30, 2016

  4. Source: nvlpubs.nist.gov
    Title: specialpublication800 86
    Link: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-86.pdf
    Source snippet

    NIST PublicationsNIST SP 800-86, Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques...by K Kent · Cited by 1010 — The guidelines and procedures sh...

  5. Source: npcc.police.uk
    Link: https://npcc.police.uk/documents/crime/2014/Revised%20Good%20Practice%20Guide%20for%20Digital%20Evidence_Vers%205_Oct%202011_Website.pdf

  6. Source: publications.parliament.uk
    Title: mckinn 1
    Link: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080730/mckinn-1.htm

  7. Source: nvlpubs.nist.gov
    Title: Publications Digital Evidence Preservation
    Link: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2022/NIST.IR.8387.pdf

  8. Source: hansard.parliament.uk
    Title: uk Gary [Mc Kinnon]({{ ‘mc-kinnon/’ | relative_url }}) (Extradition)
    Link: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2009-12-01/debates/09120144000002/GaryMckinnon%28Extradition%29

  9. Source: wired.com
    Title: terrorist or ufo truth seeker
    Link: https://www.wired.com/2006/04/terrorist-or-ufo-truth-seeker/

  10. Source: justice.gov
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict2.htm

  11. Source: justice.gov
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foia_guide09/exemption6.pdf

  12. Source: justice.gov
    Title: foia guide 2004 edition exemption 6
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-exemption-6

  13. Source: justice.gov
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/oip/page/file/1207336/dl?inline=

  14. Source: justice.gov
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/exemption6.pdf

  15. Source: justice.gov
    Title: 06.30.23. – Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-07/06.30.23.%20–%20Mar-a-Lago%20Search%20Warrant%20-%20Interim.pdf

  16. Source: justice.gov
    Title: 02.14.23. Protests Supreme Court Residences Part 1
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-02/02.14.23.%20–%20Protests%20Supreme%20Court%20Residences%20–%20Part%201.pdf

  17. Source: justice.gov
    Title: 06.09.23. Memo Violence School Administratiors (AFLF) Part 1
    Link: https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-06/06.09.23.%20–%20Memo%20Violence%20School%20Administratiors%20%28AFLF%29%20Part%201.pdf

  18. Source: history.com
    Link: https://www.history.com/shows/ancient-aliens/season-10/episode-9

  19. Source: nist.gov
    Title: osac 2024 n 0011 standard guide forensic digital image management version 10
    Link: https://www.nist.gov/document/osac-2024-n-0011-standard-guide-forensic-digital-image-management-version-10

  20. Source: GOV.UK
    Title: latest on gary mckinnon case
    Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/latest-on-gary-mckinnon-case

  21. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Gary Mc Kinnon
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon

  22. Source: reddit.com
    Title: Gary Mc Kinnon
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/y8hknz/gary_mckinnon_hacking_ufos_20_years_later/

  23. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
    Title: public views 3
    Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7af96ae5274a319e77c120/public-views-3.pdf

Additional References

  1. Source: linkedin.com
    Link: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/rip-acpo-guidelines-hello-fsr-code-practice-andrew-dodd-msc-fciis-styhe

  2. Source: athenaforensics.co.uk
    Link: https://athenaforensics.co.uk/acpo-guidelines-for-computer-forensics/

  3. Source: rcademy.com
    Link: https://rcademy.com/blockchain-based-evidence-chain-of-[custody

  4. Source: networkershome.com
    Link: https://www.networkershome.com/fundamentals/cybersecurity/digital-forensics-basics-evidence-collection/

  5. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/t3ehpf/gary_mckinnons_drawing_of_what_he_saw_on_a_nasa/

  6. Source: podmust.com
    Link: https://podmust.com/ep/?epis=R2FyeSBNY0tpbm5vbjogVGhlIEhhY2tlciBXaG8gRm91bmQgTkFTQSdzIFVGTyAmIE5vbi1UZXJyZXN0cmlhbCBPZmZpY2Vycw%3D%3D&podcast=the-daily-conspiracy

  7. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/1milfu9/hacker_solo_hacked_nasa_and_the_us_military_what/

  8. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1rhctqb/he_hacked_nasa_and_saw_a_ufo_gary_mckinnon_didnt/

  9. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/t0imdw/hi_im_gary_mckinnon_i_was_in_the_news_for_a/

  10. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/hacking/comments/1etqs6b/how_gary_mckinnon_did_what_he_did/

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

UFO Hackers

Related pages 29

More on this topic 6